That's good. I would be interested to know how you distinguish "honest"and "dishonest" uses of science in this instance, since you don't really indicate what you consider to be evidence of "dishonesty". For example, I imagine you consider the Quillette article by Jonathan Church that questions her reliance on implicit bias testing to be one of the "dishonest" articles that should be "ignored"? It's the main article I found that went into "science" to critique DiAngelo, so I guessed that was what was being referred to. If indeed that's an example of "dishonest" use of science, what about it is dishonest?

https://quillette.com/2018/08/24/the-problem-with-white-fragility-theory/