It's not an ad hominem reply because your response is ignoring my overall argument and Chopra's argument which is about the hard problem of consciousness.

The fact you refuse to engage with this argument in any meaningful way indicates to me that you don't understand why consciousness and qualia cannot be fully explained using science as science is a tool of consciousness. Which is why I asked you whether you know what qualia and the hard problem of consciousness are. If you do, then explain to me how one can use Popper's Law to explain qualia.

If you think it can't, and you also think nothing that can't have Popper's Law applied to it is worth investigating or considering, then I guess we have no further value to be had out of continuing this discussion.