I’m guessing this is a response to my comment on your previous article?

If so, I’m not sure why you’re accusing me of sexism given I am myself a woman. I’m not discounting your opinion because you’re a woman. So the snide references to “hippy dippy female pseudoscience” is a strawman, if it’s in response to my comment, because that’s not what I was getting at at all.

There was a valid back and forth that could have happened, because I think you have some valid points that are clarified here. But I also had some valid points.

But I guess you’re not interested in an actual conversation, but more in attacking a point I was not making.

Peace out.