I feel very sorry for you. Your view of sexuality is so warped. Like someone who has only ever had casual hookups for the entirety of their life. There's more to sex than just lust you know.

Also the claim "liberalism is refuted by our craving for sex" I don't know of liberals (as opposed to libertarians) who claim that people should be ABSOLUTELY free to do whatever they want with no boundaries. Most liberals support freedom unto the point that freedom harms someone else.

There is nothing wrong with "wanting to take off your clothes and play with someone's sex organs". It's not inherently a wrong desire. It's only wrong if it harms someone, ie in the case of rape.

There's also nothing wrong with being an animal. We are very smart animals, but it's not shameful that we belong to the animal kingdom. That shame is a very religious belief. That humans ought to be inherently different from animals. But why? It's OK to acknowledge we are animals. But we are animals with brains, and the ability to form ethics.

As for "right" - no one has a "right" to anything. Rights are social contracts. Rights are created by humans. But secular humanists KNOW that these rights are created by humans and sustained by humans. Religious people believe rights are divinely ordained. The right of kings to rule, the right of men to dominate women, the right of humans to dominate animals, the right of "god's chosen people" to dominate the heretics.

It's not the same and you are being very disingenuous.